Fitness tracker 2020 in the test: the best models in comparison

health

New Year’s sequel: With fitness trackers against the winter fat

Fitness tracker – useful companion to your sports routine

Fitness tracker – useful companion to your sports routine

Fitness trackers make it easy to measure athletic success. But what should you be aware of when buying a fitness tracker? And what types of wearables are there?

show description

Defeating the weaker self and strengthening the immune system: what works best? Cheap fitness bracelets in direct comparison.

Berlin.

Though fitness centre and clubs have closed due to Corona, it should not be an excuse to spend the winter on the couch. According to a study by the Robert Koch Institute, physical inactivity is a risk factor for diseases such as obesity, type 2 diabetes or heart disease, all of which have a serious course again. Covid-19 diseases can favor.

This also applies to the World Health Organization WHO lack of exercise as a cause of health problems. Fitness trackers should help make people want to train more. IMTEST, the consumer magazine from the FUNKE media group, examined entry-level products up to 79 euros.




Pedometers, training: fitness trackers can do it

Count steps: The fitness trackers from the test record the steps their wearers have taken. For this, they have so-called gyro sensors that detect the movements and use them to calculate the steps taken. They then display the results directly on their screens.

Set goals: Goals can be set for each tracker. For example, you can always keep track of how many of the 10,000 steps a day that the WHO recommends you have already completed. With some models, it is also possible to set a desired weight or distance as a personal measure.

Also read: Fitness and sports despite Corona: This is how the apartment becomes a fitness center

Register activities: For example, if you want to “track” your bike rides or jogs, you can see your progress. For example, whether longer and longer distances can be covered at higher speeds.

Assess: There is a suitable app or software for each tracker. Fitness goals can be set, the data obtained can be evaluated, progress can be checked – prizes are also awarded, eg in the form of digital medals if daily goals and other specifications are achieved.

This is how fitness trackers help to live healthier lives

Count calories: Based on physical data such as height and weight, the fitness trackers calculate the daily basic calorie consumption of the active person. If you also move, you “burn” additional “active calories”. They can also be used as a currency for personal fitness – just like the number of steps.

How to measure your heart rate: In some models, the built-in heart rate monitor not only monitors the heart rate during exercise, but also monitors the heart rate during the day, if desired. This makes it possible to draw conclusions about stress, rest and maximum heart rate and other factors.

Monitor sleep: Worn on the wrist, the fitness bracelets monitor their owners’ nocturnal movements and thus their sleep. The result is an overview of the duration of sleep including light and deep phases of sleep.

Also interesting: Felix Lobrecht starts fitness channel on Youtube – training for the home

Fitness tracker or sports watch: These are the differences

More expensive models use the satellite signal to determine the route quite accurately and in combination with time calculate interesting values ​​such as maximum and average speed. Only all cheap trackers from this test field lack such a GPS receiver. Therefore, the fitness bracelets try to estimate the distances traveled with the number of steps taken. In the test, however, this is more of a bad thing than good for all candidates.

In a direct comparison with the reference sports watch Garmin Fenix ​​6 with GPS receiver, for example, the Mi Smart Band 5 from Xiaomi calculated only 6.46 kilometers instead of 8 kilometers. The other bands (apart from the FitBit Inspire 2, which does not indicate any distance at all) determined similar adventurous values. In such deviations then information on average speed and sector times is simply not useful. To get more accurate values, the smartphone must act as a GPS transmitter.

Also read: Corona virus: RKI develops two apps – this is how data donation works with a fitness bracelet

Other differences at higher prices sportsure: Installation of additional apps is not possible and the range of features is limited to the essentials. In addition, the displays are smaller and features such as NFC (for mobile payment) are missing, as are sensors for measuring oxygen saturation in the blood. Nevertheless: models like Samsung Galaxy Fit2 are not wrong to get started.


Test result: These fitness trackers are worth it

Buying a fitness tracker is a good idea for anyone who wants to get more physically active or lose a few pounds. In this way, all important parameters are always in sight. Too serious educational evaluation But if there is GPS on board, this is missing on the cheap bracelets.

Of IMTEST test winner Above all, the Samsung Galaxy Fit2 convinces with its relatively large and colorful screen. If you want it even cheaper, you can also go with a clear conscience Value for money Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5 greb.

1st place: Samsung Galaxy Fit 2

  • Price: from 36, –
  • Despite the low price, the test’s best tracker: Above all, the relatively large and sharp screen is an important plus.
  • Supports many different sports.
  • The large screen is at the expense of comfort
  • satisfactory 2.8

2nd place: Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5

  • Price: from 29, –
  • Surprisingly functional despite the low price: Above all, the sports features and battery life are above average.
  • Colorful and sharp screen.
  • Pedometer clearly shows too many steps.
  • satisfactory 2.9

3rd place: Fitbit Inspire 2

  • Price: from 79, –
  • Although it is the best app in the test field, the competition offers much more functionality for much less money.
  • Nice app with really good sleep analysis.
  • Has only small black and white screen.
  • satisfactory 3.2

4th place: Medion S3900

  • Price: from 49, –
  • Neither in terms of sports, controls, display or smart features: the bottom line is that it is not convincing in any discipline.
  • The only tracker in the test that measures oxygen saturation.
  • Sad app with weak activity evaluation.
  • satisfactory 3.5

5th place: Huawei Band 4th

  • Price: from 24, –
  • No satellite tracking, no heart rate, but still interesting as an extra tracker for running enthusiasts.
  • Generates running technique analysis linked to the shoe.
  • The weakest equipment in the test field.
  • sufficient 3.6

Also interesting: Corona: This smartwatch may soon relieve entire clinics

Sat, 09.01.2021, at 12.03

More articles from this category can be found here: Guide



Leave a Comment